The Earth has been around for BILLIONS of years. The Earth has been through far worse than us.

The Earth has been through worldwide fires, worldwide floods, continental drifts, the magnetic reversal of the poles, meteoric bombardment, asteroid crashes that possibly eliminated the dinosaurs, glacier drifts, worldwide draughts… and you want to believe that a few /hundred/ years of industry and some plastic bags and aluminum cans are endangering this big blue ball of dirt that is floating around the Sun?

The enviroment will be fine LONG after we are gone. It is a self-correcting system, meaning that WHATEVER we do, will eventually correct and be adapted into the enviroment. That is what it does.

If you believe that all this hooplah about going green and SAVING the enviroment /isn’t/ about the BILLIONS of dollars this scare-mongering has produced, you need to wake up.

The ice age happened, read your history books, I truly don’t believe the primitive mammals that existed then were polluting the enviroment to cause MILES of ice to retreat to the polar caps. Temperatures rise, temperatures fall, that is what nature does and has done over millenia of years.

Wake up and smell the maple nut crunch.

yes, the evidence is in that parts of antarctica have shown evidence of cooling, although the recent results released in the last few weeks has come in to show that overall antarctica is warming at the same rate.

The reasons for this disparity between previous observations and current ones are also clearly explained in the recent released information. It has a lot to do with the evaporative cooling effect in play with phase shifts between states of matter. i.e. solid to liquid, liquid to gas

Of course you will just disregard this as part of the conspiracy to fool us all because it is something you dont want to beleive.

As for the logical fallacy, Sure Al Gore does appear to make money from spreading the word. This does not mean what he spreads is false, just that he has seen a way to make money.

I have not yet seen any arguement against the global warming concept that has not been shown to be based on faulty assumptions and arguements. Again this does not mean that there is not reason to question the concept but keeping an open mind and evaluating the evidence as presented a well as any counter arguments.

Anything else is just deceiving yourself.

That is the EXTRA profit over any regular cleaner.

I got 273,750,000. For one “green” company over anyone else.

Al Gore is a POLITICIAN. He has alot of influence and political experience. Most people have a positive concept of him. If he ran for any office,he would very likely win. I’m not sure if he has seen the complete data, but either way he has made millions of dollars from ticket and dvd sales. Not to mention all the good ecological awareness he has raised.
But he is NOT any kind of scientist.

Yes,difference of price for green products is small, but it really adds up quickly. We’re in a bad economy, so why pay more for the same product, minus dye?

Ex. Say a store sells 50 products per day. so for every product sold, there is an extra dollar in profit. (selling price $4- net profit $2). $50 *$2 so the net profit from a single store is $100. Per day. Multiply that by 150,000 stores. 365 days a year.

Don’t forget- producers of “green” products get tax breaks and other incentives. (subsidies,loans, etc.)

See how much money there is to be had?

A small price increase isn’t going to bankrupt consumers, but we’re capitalists. People buy “green”, so the companies that cannot compete are going bankrupt.

How much have you spent on “eco-friendly” products in the past few years?

Power. Al Gore won a Nobel peace prize and may try to run againin 2012.

On the money issue, any company with “Earth”, “green” or “enviornment” is automatically better than anything else.
For example, next time you’re in a store, look at the cleaning products. Most will have a “green” or “eco- friendly” seal on the label. People buy them, regardless of extra cost, even though most do nothing for the planet.

The truth is we know NOTHING about long- term enviornmental change. “Global Warming” is a myth designed to cause fear.

lanfear08@gmail.com

Thank you for taking your time.

I am not going to lecture the lot of you here – if you can’t fathom what you’ve already been told I don’t stand a chance in hell to influence you, but rest assured, you will, eventually, wake up from your fat-induced slumber. Hope it’s not too late for us all.

Comments such as “Inconvienent Truth” is complete b.s. are really enjoyable. Let’s pretend that “Inconvienent Truth” showed an earthquake or something…with videos….etc. Are you proposing that the earthquake is in fact false? That is never happened? That all of the instances in the movie are fake? This type of generalization reaks of uninformed people who feel because their shephard told them too.

However, a valid point would have went something like:
Parts of “Inconvienent Truth” are b.s. and here is why.
1. Fact A http:linktoFactA an unbiased source.
2. Fact B http:linktoFact B an unbiased source.

I am concerned about one fact though. People are clearly passionate about the world NOT getting warmer and they are even generally using hateful language. But, to test their intelligence and their knowledge…let me ask a question.

Are you proposing that if you have a working system and then you fill it with unnatural gases/matter/etc that it will not have an effect on that system?

The planet is clearly designed to provide and receive various types of gases for example in a way that is natural to the planet. When we add in factories, cars, etc, etc, etc, etc…doesn’t that mean that the planet is now receiving more gases than it is meant to?

So you are saying – without a doubt – being the informed people you are – that all of this extra gas has absolutely ZERO effect on the planet? That is absurb and almost laughable.

I understand this is probably very complicated for people…who say that the idea of Global Warming is COMPLETE B.S. So here is another example.

If you take 200 people who only know English and you put them into a fake society that is controlled. There is a certain amount of businesses, money, food, houses, etc. Then you throw in 75 people who do not know English….and you don’t increase anything else…what will happen to the working system?”

It will collapse.

So, to say that Global Warming is false, is not being informed. It is almost embarrassing. While all claims on Global Warming might NOT be true…the basis of it makes perfect sense.

P.S. Jack & Lindsey I don’t believe luigi akin is illiterate as he can read and write. Spelling, grammar, and syntax is a completely different matter of course. A dictionary is a wonderful tool, you should use it sometimes when you’re confused about meanings.