<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Naked model sues because she was &#8216;misrepresented&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dumb-lawsuits.com/naked-model-sues-because-she-was-misrepresented/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dumb-lawsuits.com/naked-model-sues-because-she-was-misrepresented/</link>
	<description>A collection of some of the most ridiculous lawsuits ever to grace our courts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 07:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SCHULTZ</title>
		<link>http://www.dumb-lawsuits.com/naked-model-sues-because-she-was-misrepresented/comment-page-1/#comment-73620</link>
		<dc:creator>SCHULTZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumb-lawsuits.com/?p=5#comment-73620</guid>
		<description>Hugh Hefner&#039;s Playboy magazine has taken the photography of nudes to the highest level of professionalism.  I would believe that this posing session was being conducted in the same professional manner.  How could the video taping of this session, of a woman posing nude and being painted, from anything except what is actually happening.   How can she say she was misrepresented????  Was she nude???  Was she being painted???  Did anything change once the taping began???  If not, then where is the misrepresenting??   If she is stating that because of the video taping people are going to think that this session is not what it seems and is unprofessional.   Well then, I have to say that instead of a few that were actually seeing it happen or now a whole lot more because of the tape you are what you are girl be it what it may be.  It appears her thinking is behind closed doors and for a few is being professional and &quot;on tape&quot; for the masses to see is slutty then oh well girl keep your clothes on....  In any case have a nice day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh Hefner&#8217;s Playboy magazine has taken the photography of nudes to the highest level of professionalism.  I would believe that this posing session was being conducted in the same professional manner.  How could the video taping of this session, of a woman posing nude and being painted, from anything except what is actually happening.   How can she say she was misrepresented????  Was she nude???  Was she being painted???  Did anything change once the taping began???  If not, then where is the misrepresenting??   If she is stating that because of the video taping people are going to think that this session is not what it seems and is unprofessional.   Well then, I have to say that instead of a few that were actually seeing it happen or now a whole lot more because of the tape you are what you are girl be it what it may be.  It appears her thinking is behind closed doors and for a few is being professional and &#8220;on tape&#8221; for the masses to see is slutty then oh well girl keep your clothes on&#8230;.  In any case have a nice day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haywood jablowme</title>
		<link>http://www.dumb-lawsuits.com/naked-model-sues-because-she-was-misrepresented/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>haywood jablowme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumb-lawsuits.com/?p=5#comment-130</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ll need to see the video for further review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ll need to see the video for further review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://www.dumb-lawsuits.com/naked-model-sues-because-she-was-misrepresented/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 12:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dumb-lawsuits.com/?p=5#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Oh no! Sure, she was a two time Hooters bikini champion, and a public nude portrait model, but that video made her look slutty!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no! Sure, she was a two time Hooters bikini champion, and a public nude portrait model, but that video made her look slutty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
