Even though she lost the election, Sarah Palin must have enjoyed her ride to the top of the world for 15 minutes. After all, it’s not every day a small town mayor gets to travel the world after looking at it from her state, appear on television as much or little as she wants and wear a slew of clothes worth more a golden plated igloo.
Now she may have to return those clothes after her own party sent lawyers to her home state, according to The Daily Mail.
A suit hasn’t been officially filed yet, but the presence of lawyers can’t be good. And they are Republican lawyers! They might as well have sent real live pit bulls that spit bullets.
Earlier reports claim she received $150,000 worth of clothing, but the latest reports show they are much higher than that and she didn’t actually return them. She reportedly claimed they are still at the dry cleaners in order to get the smell of shame out of them.
No suit has been filed and the Palin is still going through all of the luggage to determine which was bought by the party, so they can be donated to charity because if there’s one thing underprivileged Americans need right now, it’s a pair of shoes that are worth more than their foreclosed home.
8 responses so far ↓
1 DoanLang // Nov 9, 2008 at 2:29 pm
And….. between the $150,000 are the little tiny liberal ants, insects, and .. parasites with their eyes are being covered with “green” that they can’t think straight.. “There are no lawyers coming for Palin.” She’s clean. Get your facts straight.
2 Bonnie Werner // Nov 10, 2008 at 12:15 am
This topic is sickening. Sarah Palin deserved to look her best at all times. Due to the fact that she and her husband with five childen were unable to pay for clothing to represent herself as possible VP, she needed the assistance from the GOP. It is a Grand Ole Party, indeed, until media started picking at Sarah again. Has anyone ever questioned Joe Biden’s $2-$4,000 suites, that he kept? What about the extravagent suits that Obama showed in day after day, that we all KNOW HE DID NOT PUCHASE HIMSELF. For heavens sake, his bid for presidency was bought, and so where his wife and kids and his clothing. Why not pick on someone else. Leave Sarah alone. She does not deserve anymore of the slander. You’d better be praising her as an intelligent woman that believes with conviction that our country will be a better place with her on board. Look out, cause Sarah’s coming in 2012, and if you like her clothes now, just think how you’re going to feel about her Presidential outfits.
3 sarah cope // Nov 11, 2008 at 12:50 am
You lost get over it and she will never win considering she is the reason you lost
4 Tisi // Nov 11, 2008 at 9:04 pm
Tiny liberal ant? The article took the information from a UK article. Shouldn’t that mean it’s a bit more fact based and not some kind of ‘liberal propaganda’?
So you know, she also made Alaska pay for her kids to travel with her (since it was ‘official business’) even to places they weren’t invited (or really allowed). She’s good at calling things official business to benefit her. That’s why she wasn’t in BIG trouble for shooting animals from a helicopter. She used the loophole by quoting a rule that says any of her “official business can be done from a helicopter”. Other than that, it was highly illegal.
5 Tisi // Nov 11, 2008 at 9:09 pm
I have to add this. The dictionary definition of a liberal, since you think it’s such a bad thing.
“of, favoring, or based upon the principles of a political philosophy based on belief in progress, the essential goodness of the human race, and the autonomy of the individual and standing for the protection of political and civil liberties”
^Webster
6 ala // Nov 27, 2008 at 4:10 pm
“Real live pit bulls that spit bullets”? Really? Let’s not perpetuate an ignorant breed myth if you’re trying to make an informed political statement.
7 Ralph DeMattia // Dec 19, 2008 at 6:29 am
Look at all these idiot WOMEN excusing what Palin did because she neededo “Look her best”, yet she couldn’t afford the kind of clothes WE bought for her, and now she’ll donate them to charity? Won’t THAT look great? Some bag lady with all her belongings in a shopping cart and wearing a $2,500.00 dress? I’m glad that wastefull bitch isn’t MY governor! What: she can’t go to Penney’s or Sears or The GAP for her clothes, expecially if we’re paying for them? Screw her!!
8 its not yet over // Dec 29, 2008 at 4:18 am
sorry..but im not an idiot woman…what she did is rediculous…and the reason the dimocrats didnt have to return theryre suits is because they actually WON the election…and will continue to present themselves as the leaders of america…sorry…but if she spent that much on clothing and is being such a baby about returning the american money…then i can only imagine how much money she could waste in 4 to 8 years…
Leave a Comment